Skip to Content

Should You Add a Sunset Clause to Your Prenup?


Engaging in a conversation around a prenuptial agreement can be sensitive and emotionally charged. The idea of planning for potential dissolution during a union's beginning can seem counterintuitive and even distressing. But the reality is, these agreements can offer a level of security and peace of mind. One additional consideration to make when drafting a prenup is whether to include a sunset clause.

A sunset clause, also known as a "sunset provision" or "termination clause," is essentially an expiration date for the terms outlined in a prenuptial agreement. This means that after a certain period, typically 5-10 years, the agreement will no longer be valid, and the couple will have to renegotiate or create a new agreement.

The main purpose of a sunset clause is to address the possibility of changing circumstances in a marriage. It allows for the prenup to adapt and evolve with the relationship as it matures over time. This can be especially beneficial for couples who may enter a marriage with significant differences in assets or income, but over time those differences may diminish.

Pros and Cons of Sunset Clauses in Prenuptial Agreements

Like with most legal decisions, there are both advantages and disadvantages to including a sunset clause in your prenuptial agreement.

On the plus side:

  • Adaptability: A significant advantage of a sunset clause is its inherent adaptability. As couples grow and change together, their financial situations and personal circumstances can also evolve. A sunset clause allows for these changes to be taken into consideration, ensuring the prenuptial agreement stays relevant and fair.
  • Incentive for longevity: The use of a sunset clause can also be seen as an incentive to maintain the marriage for a certain period of time. By establishing an expiration date for the prenuptial agreement, some couples may find an additional motivation to work through challenges in their relationship.
  • Creates a starting point for discussion: A sunset clause can serve as a catalyst for open communication about finances. By knowing that the agreement will need to be reviewed at some point, couples are encouraged to regularly discuss and evaluate their financial status, ideally leading to a healthier and more transparent relationship.

However, sunset clauses aren't without their potential drawbacks:

  • Potential for resentment: For some couples, the idea of reevaluating and potentially renegotiating a prenuptial agreement after a certain period of time can cause feelings of resentment or mistrust. This may be especially true if one partner has significantly more assets or income than the other.
  • Expensive and time-consuming: Creating a prenuptial agreement can already be a costly and time-consuming process. Adding a sunset clause means the couple will have to repeat this process every 5-10 years, incurring additional legal fees and potentially causing unnecessary stress.
  • Creates uncertainty: While a sunset clause does provide for adaptability, it also creates uncertainty about the future of the couple's finances. This may be particularly challenging for individuals who value stability and security.

Why Many Attorneys Discourage the Use of Sunset Clauses in Prenuptial Agreements

While sunset clauses can be seen as flexible and adaptable, many attorneys caution against their use in prenuptial agreements. This discouragement stems from the potential legal complications and emotional stress that could result from renegotiating terms every few years.

One of the primary reasons attorneys might advise against sunset clauses is due to the financial implications. The renegotiation process can be expensive, and the constantly changing terms could also lead to financial instability. Individuals who have built up significant wealth may find it unsettling to have their financial security tied to an agreement that could change or be voided over time. This uncertainty can also lead to tension in the relationship, especially if one party is more comfortable with the sunset clause than the other.

Sunset clauses could also potentially be used manipulatively. For instance, a wealthier spouse could pressure the other into agreeing to less favorable terms as the sunset date approaches. This could result in unfair outcomes, particularly if the less wealthy spouse is dependent on the other for financial support. Therefore, while sunset clauses offer certain benefits, they also come with significant potential downsides that should be carefully considered.

Is a Sunset Clause Right for You?

Deciding whether to include a sunset clause in your prenuptial agreement ultimately depends on your specific circumstances and preferences. It's important to carefully consider the potential pros and cons and consult with a legal professional to make an informed decision.

If you do choose to include a sunset clause, make sure it's clearly written and specifies the terms for renegotiation or creating a new agreement. This can help avoid confusion and potential conflicts in the future.

In the end, every couple's situation is unique, and what works for one may not necessarily work for another. It's essential to have open and honest communication with your partner when discussing prenuptial agreements and carefully consider all options before making a decision. Whether or not to add a sunset clause is just one aspect of the process, but it's an important consideration that should not be overlooked.

Understanding the Timeline of a Sunset Clause

The timeline of a sunset clause in a prenuptial agreement is notable for its specificity. It's not just a vague idea of “sometime in the future”—the clause stipulates a precise duration after which the prenuptial agreement ceases to be effective. This time period is typically measured in years and often correlates with significant milestones in the marriage, such as the birth of a child or the attainment of a certain anniversary.

However, the timeline can be quite flexible and customized to suit the needs and circumstances of the couple.

Here are some examples of how a sunset clause might typically be structured:

  • The prenuptial agreement could expire after a certain number of years of marriage. For instance, the agreement might state that it becomes void after 10 years of marriage.
  • The agreement could also include a gradual phase-out. In this case, certain terms of the prenuptial agreement may cease to apply incrementally over a specified period.
  • The clause could be tied to specific events. For example, the agreement might become null and void upon the birth of a child or if a spouse completes a certain level of education during the marriage.

While the sunset clause's timeline provides an element of flexibility, it also introduces a level of uncertainty. The couple's financial situation at the end of the sunset period may be significantly different from when they first entered the marriage. This could potentially lead to disagreements and conflict when the time comes to renegotiate the prenuptial agreement. Therefore, while deciding on the inclusion of a sunset clause, it's important for the couple to consider the potential implications and consequences of this timeline on their future financial stability and harmony.

Alternatives to a Sunset Clause

While a sunset clause provides one way to address changing circumstances in a marriage, there are alternatives that can offer some of the benefits of a sunset clause, without the drawbacks. These alternatives may be particularly suited for couples who wish to maintain the security of a prenuptial agreement but still want to allow for adjustments over the course of the marriage.

One alternative is to include an amendment clause in the prenuptial agreement. An amendment clause allows the couple to make changes to the agreement as needed, without requiring a complete renegotiation every few years. This can provide flexibility while avoiding the cost and stress of regular renegotiations.

The following are some instances where an amendment clause could be particularly useful:

  • Amendment clause: This allows the couple to make specific changes or additions to the prenuptial agreement, with the agreement of both parties. It can provide couples with the flexibility to make necessary adjustments as their circumstances change, without the need to completely renegotiate or recreate the agreement.
  • Escalator clause: This type of clause allows for predetermined increases in the amount of alimony or property division that a less wealthy spouse would receive in the event of a divorce, based on the length of the marriage or the couple’s wealth.
  • Review clause: A review clause stipulates that the couple will review their agreement at certain intervals or after certain events but does not automatically void the agreement like a sunset clause. This ensures that the couple regularly revisits their agreement to make sure it is still fair and relevant while keeping the security of a standing agreement.

However, just like with sunset clauses, these alternatives still require careful consideration and potentially ongoing discussion about finances. It’s crucial to carefully weigh the benefits and drawbacks of these alternatives, in consultation with a legal advisor, before incorporating them into your prenuptial agreement.

How Percy Law Group, PC Can Help

At Percy Law Group, PC, we understand that the intricacies of prenuptial agreements — including decisions about whether to include a sunset clause — can be complex and overwhelming. Our experienced family law attorneys are committed to guiding you through this process with transparency and compassion. We take the time to understand your unique circumstances and objectives and provide personalized advice tailored to your situation. Whether you are considering a sunset clause, an amendment clause, or any other aspect of a prenuptial agreement, our team is here to help. Don't navigate these waters alone.

Contact us online or call us at (508) 206-9900 for a consultation and let us help you make the best decisions for your future.

Share To: